After just lately reviewing the ThinkPad E14 G5 AMD model, we are now in a position to take on the ThinkPad E14 G5 Intel model. Each variations proportion the similar chassis design and so we propose trying out our evaluation at the AMD model to be told extra concerning the bodily options of the type. Nevertheless, there are a couple of interior variations between the 2 which we will be able to point out within the evaluation beneath.
Our check unit is a center Intel configuration with the thirteenth gen Raptor Lake Core i7-1355U CPU and 1200p FHD+ show for roughly $915 USD. Different SKUs get started from the Core i3-1315U as much as the Core i7-13700H with not obligatory GeForce MX550 graphics and the next solution 2240 x 1400 IPS show. The configurable vary is wider than anticipated particularly for a 14-inch subnotebook.
Choices to the ThinkPad E14 G5 come with different higher midrange enterprise subnotebooks just like the HP EliteBook 845 or Dell Latitude 7440.
Extra Lenovo critiques:
Possibly one of the best ways to differentiate between the ThinkPad E14 G5 Intel and AMD variations is to search for the Thunderbolt brand alongside the left edge. The AMD variations lack each Thunderbolt and USB4 fortify giving the Intel variations the upper-hand on the subject of docking functions.
An Intel AX201 is integrated for Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.1 fortify. The pricier AX211 is not obligatory for customers who need Wi-Fi 6E connectivity.
Whilst the privateness shutter comes usual on all SKUs, the 1080p solution and IR sensor are not obligatory. Decrease-end SKUs might send with a 720p sensor.
One fascinating distinction between the Intel and AMD variations is that the Intel model does now not fortify full-length M.2 2280 SSDs as proven by way of the comparability photographs beneath. As much as two drives (PCIe4 x4 + PCIe3 x4) can nonetheless be put in, however they each and every should be as much as 42 mm (2242) in size.
There are not any extras within the field rather then the AC adapter and forms. A one-year restricted producer guaranty applies if bought in america.
3 show choices are to be had as follows:
- 1920 x 1200, IPS, 60% sRGB, 60 Hz, 300-nits, non-touch, matte
- 1920 x 1200, IPS, 60% sRGB, 60 Hz, 300-nits, contact, matte
- 2240 x 1400, IPS, 100% sRGB, 60 Hz, 300-nits, non-touch, matte
Whilst our AMD unit was once configured with the 1400p panel, our Intel unit comes with the bolded choice as an alternative. We advise the 1400p panel in case your workloads call for extra correct colours and the next distinction ratio. In a different way, different attributes like brightness and black-white reaction instances seem to be constant between all choices.
The show does now not come pre-calibrated. Calibrating the panel ourselves with an X-Ceremony colorimeter would strengthen moderate grayscale and colour deltaE values from 5.3 and four.99 to only 1.8 and 1.87, respectively. Our ICM profile is to be had to obtain above free of charge.
We set Home windows to Efficiency mode previous to checking out. Lenovo does now not come with any specialised energy profiles and as an alternative will depend on the Home windows energy profiles to scale back confusion.
Processor efficiency is weaker than anticipated at about 10 to fifteen % slower than the typical pc in our database provided with the similar Core i7-1355U. The deficit can also be attributed to the vulnerable Turbo Spice up sustainability of the device. When operating CineBench R15 xT in a loop, for instance, the preliminary ranking of 1539 issues would fall by way of up to 35 to 40 % by way of the second one loop as proven by way of the graph beneath.
When in comparison to the Ryzen 7 7730U within the AMD-based ThinkPad E14 G5, our Core i7-1355U gives 25 to 30 % sooner single-thread efficiency however 25 to 30 % slower multi-thread efficiency as soon as throttling has been accounted for.
PCMark rankings are typically not up to at the AMD configuration particularly within the Productiveness subtest the place multi-thread efficiency issues maximum.
LatencyMon displays DPC problems when opening more than one browser tabs of our homepage. 4K video playback at 60 FPS could also be imperfect with 5 dropped frames recorded all the way through a 60-second duration.
Our unit comes with the 42 mm model of the WD PC SN740 while the AMD configuration ships with the 80 mm WD PC SN740. This midrange PCIe4 x4 NVMe SSD gives learn charges of as much as 5000 MB/s however just for a few mins prior to throttling kicks in as proven by way of the graph beneath.
RAM is slower than moderate at simply DDR4-3200 which negatively affects built-in graphics efficiency. Our Iris Xe 96 EUs is set 10 to fifteen % slower than the typical pc in our database with the similar GPU because of the throttling CPU and gradual RAM. General efficiency is set the similar because the RX Vega 8 within the Ryzen 7 7730U model in consequence.
Fan noise between the AMD and Intel variations isn’t very other. Prime so much like video games would succeed in equivalent maximums of simply over 40 dB(A) on each and every model whilst slight fan pulsing would nonetheless happen all the way through decrease so much like surfing or streaming. The fan is differently simple to forget about when operating low to medium so much.
Floor temperatures are warmest at the left part of the chassis and close to the rear air flow grilles. Sizzling spots at the keyboard and backside surfaces can succeed in as much as 41 C and 54 C, respectively, very similar to what we recorded at the AMD configuration.
CPU clock price and board energy draw when starting up Prime95 rigidity would spike to 4 GHz and 52 W, respectively, lasting for roughly 30 seconds and at a core temperature of 97 C. The processor would then cycle between 1.6 GHz to a few.9 GHz and 14 W to 43 W thereafter as a way to take care of cooler core temperatures as proven by way of the screenshot beneath. The clock price throttling vary could be very broad and is the reason the slower-than-expected CineBench effects discussed above and the wide-ranging energy intake numbers within the subsequent segment.
Core temperature would hover round 80 C when operating aggravating so much in comparison to slightly below 70 C at the Dell Latitude 7440.
Energy intake conduct displays the steep CPU throttling conduct discussed above. When operating Prime95, for instance, intake would cycle between 29 W and 67 W while the very same check at the AMD ThinkPad E14 G5 would go back a extra stable price of 47 W.
Intake can also be as top as 67 W from the small (9 x 4.7 x 2.7 cm) 65 W USB-C AC adapter when the CPU is at 100% usage. The Intel device is due to this fact extra energy hard than the AMD device when Turbo Spice up is at its quickest corresponding to when multitasking or launching packages. This will also be seen when starting up the CineBench R15 xT benchmark as proven by way of the comparability graph beneath. In a different way, intake is set the similar between the 2 variations when idling on desktop or when operating much less hard so much.
The battery is smaller for some Intel configurations when in comparison to our AMD configuration (47 Wh vs. 57 Wh) and so customers will have to be expecting shorter runtimes if configured with the smaller choice. We are ready to browse the internet for roughly 5.5 hours prior to automated shutdown in comparison to virtually 10 hours at the AMD model.
Charging from empty to complete capability is differently very speedy at simply over an hour with the integrated AC adapter. Fast Fee is enabled by way of default.
Our Intel unit as configured with the Core i7 CPU, 16 GB RAM, 1200p touchscreen, and 512 GB SSD retails for roughly $915 USD in comparison to $865 for the Ryzen 7 model with the similar RAM, touchscreen, and SSD. Choosing the AMD model will web you quicker multi-thread efficiency, longer battery existence, and correct M.2 2280 SSD fortify whilst the Intel model will web you quicker single-thread efficiency and Thunderbolt fortify. Different facets like graphics efficiency and fan noise are differently very equivalent between the 2 variations. Thus, except in the event you actually price single-thread efficiency and Thunderbolt, the AMD model is more uncomplicated to counsel over the Intel model for almost all of consumers.
The Intel-based ThinkPad E14 G5 reveals steeper throttling conduct than its more cost effective Ryzen 7 selection.
A couple of business-centric auxiliary options like WAN and Good Card are lacking, however this is by way of design because the ThinkPad E sequence is meant to be a extra inexpensive selection to the higher-end and a lot more dear ThinkPad T sequence or X sequence.
Amazon is now delivery the ThinkPad E14 Gen 5 as reviewed for $915 USD. Lenovo could also be delivery the similar type however with further RAM for simply over $1030.
Allow 48h for review and removal.