The ZBook Fury 16 G10 instantly succeeds ultimate three hundred and sixty five days’s ZBook Fury 16 G9 with new thirteenth gen Raptor Lake-HX CPU and Nvidia RTX Ada GPU imaginable possible choices to switch the older twelfth gen Alder Lake and RTX Ampere processors, respectively. The brand new style is otherwise visually similar to the Fury 16 G9 and so we advise catching up on our evaluate for ultimate three hundred and sixty five days’s style to be told further in regards to the bodily possible choices of the Fury 16 G10.
Our particular evaluate unit is a higher-end configuration with the Core i9-13950HX, Nvidia RTX 5000 Ada, and 2400p IPS show for roughly $5300 USD retail. Lesser configurations are to be had for decrease beginning costs as detailed by means of the unique HP specs checklist.
Possible imaginable possible choices to the Fury 16 G10 come with different 16-inch cellular workstations similar to the Dell Precision 5680, Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1, MSI CreatorPro Z16P, or the Asus ProArt StudioBook 16.
Additional HP opinions:
HP laptops proceed to have one of the crucial perfect possible solution webcams available in the market. The 5 MP sensor at the Fury 16 G10 provides a far cleaner image than the two MP webcam at the Precision 5680.
Servicing is “tool-less” right through the sense that the ground panel can also be got rid of with none equipment. As soon as within, on the other hand, a screwdriver might be required to take away the steel plate protective the 4 SSDs and 4 RAM modules. You’ll be able to as a result of this truth alternatively desire a screwdriver for any necessary upgrades.
As much as 128 GB of RAM is supported albeit simplest as much as 4000 MT/s.
There aren’t any extras right through the field as a substitute of the AC adapter and paperwork. HP provides 3 years restricted guaranty as standard.
The next 3 eDP+PSR (Panel Self Refresh) show imaginable possible choices are to be had for the 16-inch Fury 16 G10. Our particular evaluate unit has been configured with the bolded probability:
- 3840 x 2400, 60Hz, OLED, touchscreen, 400 nits, 100% DCI-P3, shiny
- 3840 x 2400, 120 Hz, IPS, non-touch, 500 nits, 100% DCI-P3, matte
- 1920 x 1200, 60 Hz, IPS, non-touch, 1000 nits, 100% sRGB, matte
Our unbiased measurements with an X-Ceremony colorimeter read about each all the P3 protection and 500-nit most brightness as marketed. The 120 Hz refresh value may be a noticeable spice up over the 60 Hz panel on ultimate three hundred and sixty five days’s Fury 16 G9. This is one of the only a few workstations available in the market these days to supply a 4K IPS panel with each P3 colours and a handy guide a rough 120 Hz refresh value.
The show comes well-calibrated out of the sector in opposition to the P3 standard and so an end-user calibration is as a result of this truth now not as an important.
We set Space house home windows to Efficiency mode previous to working any benchmarks beneath.
Complex Optimus, MUX, and Intel Xeon CPUs aren’t supported. Alternatively, it is value noting that the best way formally helps DDR5 ECC RAM irrespective of the loss of any Xeon imaginable possible choices which is a function now not discovered on maximum different cellular workstations.
ECC VRAM mode can also be toggled on our off similar to on different Ada Lovelace GPUs designed for workstations. Enabling it reduces the utmost usable VRAM from 16 GB to fifteen GB.
CPU capacity is a mixed bag. On one hand, multi-thread capacity is more or less 25 to 30 % faster than the Core i9-12950HX in ultimate three hundred and sixty five days’s Fury 16 G9. Alternatively, capacity averages about 15 % slower than on different laptops with the an equivalent Core i9-13950HX processor as our HP. The very same CPU right through the bigger Razer Blade 18 and MSI GE78HX, as an example, run constantly faster than our HP. This is not to mention that the Fury 16 G10 is sluggish, alternatively it unquestionably displays that the CPU is rather slower than anticipated.
PCMark scores are forward of ultimate three hundred and sixty five days’s Fury 16 G9 particularly right through the Virtual Content material subject matter topic subject matter Creation subtest as a result of the numerous bounce in GPU capacity. Inside the length in-between, the Precision 5680 scores increased in Productiveness as a result of its RAID 0 SSDs. In spite of everything, our HP can also be configured with RAID if desired.
LatencyMon unearths DPC problems when opening a couple of tabs of our homepage. 4K video playback at 60 FPS is with regards to absolute best imaginable with only one dropped body recorded during a 60-second period.
Our take a look at unit ships with an SK hynix PC801 PCIe4 x4 NVMe SSD while our older Fury G16 G9 unit would send with a Micron 3400. Sadly, capacity would alternatively throttle to as little as 3400 MB/s after a couple of minute into our force take a look at as showed by means of the graph beneath. It is transparent that the 4 M.2 SSD slots would in all probability merely in point of fact use some further cooling to strengthen capacity consistency.
The RTX 5000 Ada in our HP system is 10 to twenty % faster than the an equivalent GPU at the Dell Precision 5680. Its slight on the other hand constant capacity benefits can also be attributed to the upper TGP ceiling while the GPU right through the aforementioned Dell would run at a decrease energy envelope. Our Energy Take a look at segment beneath main points our observations.
Total capacity is for sure forward of the RTX A5500 in ultimate three hundred and sixty five days’s Fury 16 G9 by means of as much as 40 % and even 80 % relying at the software.
Fan traits underneath standard use, noise in a large number of load eventualities consistent with measurements, anxious bleeping noises (of, e.g., transistors) and different irregularities (fast-spinning HDD, ODD, unsteady fan,…)
Analyse noise traits – any abnormalities? Temporary evaluate:Temporary research of noise emissions, comparability of festival.Max. 500 characters
Ground temperatures can succeed in over 36 C at the keyboard heart or 45 C alongside the rear when working absolute best somewhat just a bit. It seems that, the system is cooler than the Precision 5680 at the keyboard on the other hand the other is correct for his or her backside surfaces.
Reasonably priced CPU clock charges and board energy draw when working Prime95 would stabilize at 1.5 GHz and 48 W, respectively, in comparison to 2.9 GHz and 115 W at the Razer Blade 18 provided with the an equivalent Core i9-13950HX CPU. Core temperature might be cooler by means of round 8 C at the HP to indicate that the Fury 16 G10 is prioritizing temperature regulate over faster capacity.
Running on Balanced mode reduces graphics capacity. As an example, GPU clock charges and tool draw when working Witcher 3 would stabilize at 1845 MHz and 102 W, respectively, in comparison to 1770 MHz and 94 W when on Balanced mode. Every method, the HP system reaches increased real-world TGP values than the an equivalent GPU right through the Precision 5680 the place it’s only 72 W.
Energy intake underneath load stays regarding the an equivalent as on ultimate three hundred and sixty five days’s style irrespective of the CPU and GPU enhancements for far increased performance-per-watt. It is also generally increased than at the Precision 5680 as a result of the upper TGP targets of the HP style.
Word that our Fury 16 G10 would draw noticeably further energy than the similarly-configured Precision 5680 when working absolute best somewhat just a bit like video video video games due most commonly to the upper energy ceiling targets for the HP. The HP ships with a 230 W AC adapter while the Dell would send with a smaller 165 W USB-C AC adapter as an alternative.
Elementary runtimes aren’t any shorter than on ultimate three hundred and sixty five days’s style irrespective of the will increase in CPU capacity, GPU capacity, and show refresh value. We are in a position to document simply over 7 hours of WLAN surfing on Balanced mode or with regards to an hour longer than on ultimate three hundred and sixty five days’s Fury 16 G9.
Charging from empty to complete capability with the built-in AC adapter takes somewhat beneath 90 mins. The system can also be charged by the use of third-party USB-C adapters albeit further slowly.
From time to time the year-over-year processor updates can also be rather minor. Different occasions, on the other hand, they can be rather essential. The ZBook Fury 16 G10 falls into the latter magnificence as its thirteenth gen CPU and Nvidia RTX Ada GPU imaginable possible choices will also be offering sizable boosts in capacity over the ZBook Fury 16 G9 particularly in the case of graphics. When you worth ECC RAM and maximizing GPU energy with increased TGP limits, then the Fury 16 G10 is in reality value taking into consideration over each other 16-inch workstation these days along side the Precision 5680 which comes with the an equivalent GPU imaginable possible choices on the other hand at decrease TGP targets.
The ZBook Fury 16 G10 maximizes GPU energy to be some of the quickest cellular workstations in the case of graphics. Alternatively, this turns out to return at the price of SSD and CPU capacity.
A few problems cling another time the HP from being “absolute best imaginable”. SSD throttling alternatively happens whilst the CPU is slower than anticipated even if set to Efficiency mode. Those might be more straightforward to forgive on slimmer or smaller workstations, on the other hand the Fury 16 G10 is anything else on the other hand thin-and-light.
HP is now provide its ZBook Fury 16 G10 beginning at $2700 USD for the bottom configuration as much as over $4200 when totally configured with Core i9 and RTX 5000 Ada.
Allow 48h for review and removal.