The Acer Swift Edge SFE16 has been refreshed this season to make stronger the brand new Zen 4 Ryzen 7 7840U CPU up from the Zen 3+ Ryzen 7 7735U launched only a few months prior. The up to date type additionally will get a brand new 120 Hz 3.2K Samsung OLED panel as an alternative of the 4K 60 Hz one at the Zen 3+ configuration.
Rather then the CPU and GPU variations above, each the Swift Edge SFE16 Zen 4 and Swift Edge SFE16 Zen 3+ use equivalent chassis designs with a couple of variations which we will be able to observe on this evaluate. Internally, alternatively, many facets of the motherboard have modified. We suggest trying out our evaluate at the Swift Edge SFE16 Zen 3+ to be informed extra concerning the bodily options of the type.
Choices to the Swift Edge come with different light-weight 16-inch Ultrabooks just like the LG Gram 16, Samsung Galaxy Book3 Professional 16, Asus VivoBook 16, or the Huawei MateBook 16s.
The Swift Edge 16 will have to no longer be at a loss for words with the Swift X 16 which is a thicker computer with sooner H-series CPUs and devoted GeForce RTX graphics.
Extra Acer opinions:
The Swift Edge 16 Zen 4 would possibly glance similar to the Swift Edge 16 Zen 3+ in the beginning look, however external adjustments are noticeable upon nearer inspection. Originally, the more recent model integrates a numpad while this was once lacking at the Zen 3+ model. Secondly, the air flow grilles above the primary row of keyboard keys are actually long past and the entrance edge is now steady without a cuts. The latter is a extraordinary alternate because it makes the lid tougher to open consequently.
Rather then that, the type makes use of the similar clean magnesium and aluminum chassis fabrics, the similar ports and positioning, and the similar measurement clickpad as prior to. Dimensions are simply fairly wider or even thinner this time round, however the variations are tricky to note in follow.
Acer has added a MicroSD reader while the function was once lacking at the Ryzen 7 7735U configuration. Alternatively, switch charges are about 3x slower than the SD card readers on competing fashions just like the Asus VivoBook Professional 16 or Samsung Galaxy Book3 Extremely 16.
The MediaTek module has strangely gradual transmit speeds when on Wi-Fi 6 very similar to what we noticed at the Zen 3+ configuration. Wi-Fi 6E speeds are another way superb when paired to our Asus AXE11000 6 GHz community.
The webcam is an efficient 3.7 MP with recording as much as 1440p30 up from the two.1 MP and 1080p30 recording at the Zen 3+ configuration for a fairly sharper image.
There’s nonetheless no integrated webcam privateness shutter or IR make stronger.
The ground panel is straightforward to open with a Torx wrench. The enthusiasts and motherboard have modified fairly considerably between the Zen 3+ and Zen 4 fashions as proven by way of the photographs beneath. The SSD, as an example, now lies subsequent to the battery pack.
There are not any extras within the field as opposed to the bureaucracy and AC adapter. A one-year restricted producer guaranty applies if bought in america.
Our unit ships with a 3200 x 2000 120 Hz OLED show as an alternative of the 3840 x 2400 60 Hz OLED show on our previous Zen 3+ Swift Edge 16 evaluate unit. The 2 Samsung panels another way be offering equivalent colour coverages, brightness ranges, black ranges, and really rapid reaction instances. The upper solution choice could also be extra helpful for positive programs like Excel or side-by-side multitasking home windows, however it is tricky to return to 60 Hz when you develop conversant in the speedier 120 Hz refresh price of our decrease solution 3.2K choice. For gaming functions, the 120 Hz show approach you’ll be able to goal 40 FPS as an alternative of 30 FPS while not having to fret about display tearing.
A continuing pulse-width modulation of 238 Hz is provide on all brightness ranges together with even the utmost atmosphere. Any such habits is not unusual on OLED shows starting from smartphones to laptops.
We set Home windows to Efficiency mode previous to working the benchmarks beneath. Acer contains no specialised instrument for efficiency or show changes not like at the Asus VivoBook sequence.
FreeSync isn’t supported at the inner show.
Multi-thread efficiency is fairly however constantly at the back of maximum different laptops with the similar Ryzen 7 7840U. The hot AMD Framework Pc 13.5, as an example, would run 15 % sooner. The discrepancy is because of the weaker Turbo Core doable of the CPU within the Acer stemming from its small cooling answer relative to the huge 16-inch display measurement. CineBench R15 xT ratings would drop by way of up to 21 % through the years as proven by way of our comparability graph beneath.
General efficiency remains to be sooner than the Zen 3+ Ryzen 7 7735U within the older Acer Swift Edge SFE16-42-R1GM by way of about 15 % in each single- and multi-threaded rather a lot in spite of the throttling.
LatencyMon finds no main DPC problems when opening more than one browser tabs of our homepage. 4K video playback at 60 FPS may be absolute best without a dropped frames recorded.
Our take a look at unit ships with an SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N which opponents the Samsung PM9A1 on paper. Actually, alternatively, the pressure on our unit would throttle to as little as 3500 MB/s after simply a few mins of pressure as proven by way of the graph beneath. This habits was once noticed on our older Swift Edge 16 as smartly to indicate that the drives be afflicted by insufficient cooling or warmth dissipation.
The 2022 Radeon 680M was once already a large spice up over the sooner RX Vega sequence and so the 2023 Radeon 780M is extra of a minor refresh with simply marginal enhancements. On this case, the Radeon 780M in our Acer is only a few proportion issues sooner than the 680M within the Zen 3+ configuration.
Surroundings the machine to Balanced mode as an alternative of Efficiency mode or working on battery energy will have an effect on general efficiency as proven by way of our Fireplace Strike effects desk beneath.
| Energy Profile | Graphics Ranking | Physics Ranking | Mixed Ranking |
| Efficiency Mode | 7156 | 20127 | 2511 |
| Balanced Mode | 4682 (-37%) | 15022 (-25%) | 1726 (-31%) |
| Battery Energy | 4982 (-33%) | 14856 (-26%) | 1734 (-31%) |
GPU efficiency would additionally throttle through the years very similar to what we noticed when working the CineBench R15 xT loop take a look at above. When idling on Witcher 3, as an example, body charges would get started prime at 45 FPS prior to in the end slowing and stabilizing within the low 30 FPS vary.
Fan noise has no longer truly modified from the Zen 3+ configuration even supposing the choice of enthusiasts has modified. That is unlucky because the fan in our Zen 3+ take a look at unit would pulse continuously and loudly once heavier rather a lot are offered and our Zen 4 unit can be no other. Fan noise ceaselessly hovers round 28 dB(A) in opposition to a silent background of 24 dB(A) when internet surfing or streaming whilst heavier rather a lot would stabilize at 41 dB(A) very similar to prior to.
Floor temperatures don’t seem to be considerably cooler or hotter than we recorded at the Ryzen 7 7735U configuration. Sizzling spots at the backside nonetheless achieve over 50 C close to the vents whilst the highest floor close to the hinges can vary from 40 C to 50 C relying at the perspective of the lid. Fingers are not going to the touch those scorching spaces for lengthy sessions when gaming.
The restricted Turbo Core doable of the Acer may also be noticed when pressure checking out with benchmarks. Clock charges and board energy draw when starting up Prime95 pressure would spice up to three.5 GHz and 30 W, respectively, prior to continuously falling to only 2.3 GHz and 18 W over the following minute. Core temperature would additionally stabilize at a moderately low 64 C. Repeating this take a look at at the AMD Framework Pc 13.5 with the similar CPU would lead to upper values throughout at 3.2 GHz, 35 W, and 85 C compared.
Core temperature when working Witcher 3 would stabilize at simply 56 C or round 15 C cooler than at the Framework discussed above. It is transparent that the machine prioritizes decrease floor temperatures over upper efficiency.
Energy intake when idling is upper than on maximum different laptops with built-in GPUs because of the prime 120 Hz refresh price and OLED panel of our Acer configuration which might be recognized to be extra energy hard than the standard 60 Hz IPS. Showing an all-white symbol at 120 Hz would eat up to 19 W in comparison to not up to part at the Framework Pc 13.5.
Conversely, energy intake when gaming can be less than anticipated because of the throttling inclinations of the processor. Intake would get started out prime all over the beginning of the take a look at prior to continuously falling through the years as proven by way of our graphs beneath to indicate efficiency throttling.
WLAN runtime is shorter than what we recorded on our earlier unit by way of virtually two entire hours even if each are set to the similar energy profile settings and browser prerequisites. The 120 Hz refresh price is most probably a contributing issue to the battery existence variations.
The Zen 3+ Swift Edge 16 was once already one in every of our favourite 16-inch laptops and the up to date Zen 4 configuration most effective solidifies our stance. The extent of CPU energy and particularly GPU energy to be had is prime bearing in mind the low weight and skinny profile. In the meantime, the three.2K 120 Hz OLED show is among the easiest we have now noticed on any multimedia computer for phrase processing, modifying, surfing, video, or even gaming. If you wish to maximize efficiency and show high quality whilst minimizing weight up to conceivable, then the Swift Edge 16 truly hits the mark.
The Ryzen 7 7840U provides a tight spice up to efficiency over the already nice Ryzen 7 7735U Swift Edge 16 configuration. Customers will love the 120 Hz OLED and occasional weight, however the moderate battery existence and function throttling would possibly irk energy customers.
Cutbacks get up when taking a look past the CPU and show. For the reason that computer is terribly mild for its measurement, positive options needed to be got rid of or decreased such because the smaller cooling answer, smaller battery capability, and loss of Gorilla Glass or touchscreen to stay weight low. Because of this, the CPU runs slightly slower than anticipated, battery existence is most effective moderate, the SSD throttles underneath pressure, and the show is extra liable to twisting and wobbling than we would love. Growth may be restricted since RAM is soldered and just one inner SSD is supported.
Should you completely want the horsepower of H-series CPUs and GeForce RTX GPUs, then it’s possible you’ll need to imagine the heavier Swift X 16, Asus VivoBook Professional 16, or Galaxy Book3 Extremely 16 as an alternative. Consistent vacationers may have extra to love concerning the Swift Edge 16 as they may be able to extra ceaselessly exploit the low weight of the machine with out sacrificing show high quality or an excessive amount of efficiency.
The Acer Swift Edge SFE16 as reviewed with the Ryzen 7 7840U is now extensively to be had at Absolute best Purchase for $1300 USD.
Allow 48h for review and removal.