No products in the cart.
Latest Technology Updates
4K gaming performance on an i9 + RTX 4090 Laptop configuration
On this article we’re discussing the gaming functionality you will have to be expecting at 4K answer (3840 x 2160 px) on fashionable laptops constructed on the most recent RTX 4000 Ada Lovelace graphics chips from Nvidia.
Whilst we’re lately within the technique of trying out a handful of RTX 4000 notebooks, I’m simplest going to the touch on gaming at 4K answer on top-tier Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Pc configurations for now, however will replace with RTX 4080/4070 functionality within the close to long term.
(*11*)
Those preliminary findings are in keeping with the Asus ROG Scar 18 18-inch laptop reviewed on this article. Listed below are the specifications of that laptop:
- Intel Core i9-13980HX + Nvidia RTX 4090 Pc 16GB 175W, 32 GB of DDR5 RAM, 2 TB gen4 SSD (235W CPU+GPU design at the Turbo profile, with as much as 175W at the GPU – set on Turbo mode, with the MUX on Final – dGPU mode).
I’ll replace this segment with hyperlinks to different opinions as soon as to be had.
The Scar comes with an 18-inch QHD+ show, similar to the vast majority of different high-performance laptops of this technology, so we’re trying out 4K gaming functionality on an exterior track hooked up by way of the HDMI 2.1 port, which hooks into the dGPU.
Our check track is the 32-inch Asus ROG Swift, with 4K answer, as much as 144Hz refresh, and FreeSync/GSync.
(*5*)(*1*)
(*18*)(*2*)(*17*)
(*12*) (*6*)
It’s additionally essential to notice that the Scar implements the highest-power variant of the RTX 4090 cellular chip, operating at as much as 175W TGP with Dynamic Spice up 2.0, and the GPU is sponsored up by means of a very good cooling resolution and a excessive TDP implementation of the Core i9-13980HX processor, the quickest CPU to be had on laptops as of late.
That suggests the effects mentioned down under are pretty-much a best-case situation for 4090 laptops at this level, as now not all of the to be had implementations are going to accomplish in a similar way, particularly the ones choices with thinner-and-lighter designs.
So listed below are the effects:
| Core i9-13980HX + RTX 4090 Pc 150-175W | QHD+ Turbo, CPU -30 mV, Final dGPU mode, on table | 4K Turbo on exterior track, CPU -30 mV, Final dGPU mode, on table |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (DX 12, Extremely Preset, RTX OFF) | 92 fps (60 fps – 1% low) | 77 fps (31 fps – 1% low) |
| Doom Everlasting (Vulkan, Extremely Preset) | 378 fps (46 fps – 1% low) | 198 fps (48 fps – 1% low) |
| A long way Cry 6 (DX 12, Extremely Preset, TAA) | 120 fps (83 fps – 1% low) | 83 fps (56 fps – 1% low) |
| A long way Cry 5 (DX 11, Extremely Preset, SMAA) | 159 fps (101 fps – 1% low) | 107 fps (69 fps – 1% low) |
| Metro Exodus (DX 12, Extremely Preset, RTX OFF) | 107 fps (69 fps – 1% low) | 77 fps (48 fps – 1% low) |
| Pink Useless Redemption 2 (DX 12, Extremely Optimized, TAA) | 133 fps (88 fps – 1% low) | 71 fps (47 fps – 1% low) |
| Shadow of Tomb Raider (DX 12, Very best Preset, TAA) | 153 fps (97 fps – 1% low) | 86 fps (47 fps – 1% low) |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt (DX 11, Extremely Preset, TAAU) | 82 fps (44 fps – 1% low) | 56 fps (28 fps – 1% low) |
- Battlefield V, Cyberpunk, Doom, Witcher 3 – recorded with Fraps/in-game FPS counter in marketing campaign mode;
- A long way Cry 5, 6, Metro, Pink Useless Redemption 2, Tomb Raider video games – recorded with the integrated Benchmark utilities;
- Pink Useless Redemption 2 Optimized profile in keeping with those settings.
A majority of these titles are playable at 4K answer on Extremely graphics settings, with Witcher 3 being the one one that dips underneath 60 fps with the most recent replace.
The excellent news is that the functionality isn’t CPU restricted at 4K answer in this 4090 175W configuration, not like at decrease resolutions (some titles at QHD+ res, and maximum titles at FHD+ res). So you might be getting your cash’s price when purchasing a 4090 laptop for gaming at 4K. Smartly, form of … extra about this in a little.
The ones above are rasterization exams, and listed below are some effects for RTX – Ray Tracing functionality, with and with out DLSS.
| Core i9-13980HX + RTX 4090 Pc 150-175W | QHD+ Turbo, CPU -30 mV, Final dGPU, on table | 4K Turbo on exterior track, CPU -30 mV, Final dGPU, on table |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (DX 12, Extremely Preset + RTX, DLSS Off) | 83 fps (52 fps – 1% low) | 43 fps (17 fps – 1% low) |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (DX 12, Extremely Preset + RTX, DLSS Balanced) | 124 fps (87 fps – 1% low) | 71 fps (22 fps – 1% low) |
| Doom Everlasting (DX 12, Extremely Preset, RTX On, DLSS Off) | 258 fps (45 fps – 1% low) | 151 fps (42 fps – 1% low) |
| Doom Everlasting (DX 12, Extremely Preset, RTX On, DLSS High quality) | 256 fps (51 fps – 1% low) | 167 fps (48 fps – 1% low) |
| A long way Cry 6 (DX 12, Extremely Preset + DXR reflections / shadows) | 103 fps (68 fps – 1% low) | 73 fps (48 fps – 1% low) |
| Shadow of Tomb Raider (DX 12, Very best Preset, TAA, RTX Extremely, DLSS Off) | 103 fps (64 fps – 1% low) | 58 fps (29 fps – 1% low) |
| Shadow of Tomb Raider (DX 12, Very best Preset, TAA, RTX Extremely, DLSS On) | 119 fps (65 fps – 1% low) | 65 fps (3 fps – 1% low) |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt (DX 11, Extremely Preset, TAAU, RT Extremely, DLSS Off) | 41 fps (22 fps – 1% low) | 26 fps (12 fps – 1% low) |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt (DX 11, Extremely Preset, TAAU, RT Extremely, DLSS On) | 72 fps (38 fps – 1% low) | 42 fps (22 fps – 1% low) |
With Ray-Tracing on, the functionality takes a dip in lots of titles, so that you’ll possibly need to turn on DLSS Body Era to carry the framerates to playable ranges. Simply watch out that DLSS provides in a good bit of lag or even some ghosting and graphical artifacts in some titles. The lag isn’t that unhealthy in slower-paced video games, however is a nuisance for faster-paced titles.
Is reasonably, DLSS3 era and the Ada Lovelace cellular platform are nonetheless younger on the time we’re operating those exams, early into 2023, so the enjoy will have to give a boost to through the years.
Abstract on 4K laptop gaming
General, the RTX 4090 Pc dGPU is just about the primary cellular resolution that may correctly take care of 4K gaming in most present video games, and a significant (40-70%) step-up in functionality from the beefiest RTX 3080Ti Pc implementations of the previous generations. Alternatively, even this one struggles while you turn on Ray-Tracing in probably the most not easy video games, so that you’ll both must trim down the graphics settings or flip to DLSS for added body insertion so as to stay issues having a look easy.
I’ll additionally upload that in spite of being referred to as an RTX 4090 chip, which is a novelty for the cellular area, this cellular 4090 variant is slightly a downgrade in options and function in comparison to the desktop 4090 chip. It comes with 60% fewer processing cores (~9700 CUDAs vs ~16000 CUDAs at the desktop fashion), 80% decrease frequencies, and kind of 50% of the TGP, so as to are compatible within a pocket book chassis.
Thus, as a possible purchaser, you’ll must make a decision whether or not you’re prepared to spend the type of cash OEMs ask for one of those 4090 laptops (3500-5000 USD/EUR), otherwise you’d higher pass with a PC and 4090 desktop GPU for a similar more or less cash or even much less. Particularly because the majority of those RTX 4090 notebooks are fairly giant and heavy anyway, and most commonly supposed for table use.
The next video from {Hardware} Unboxed additional touches on 4K gaming functionality on RTX laptops and the way it compares to the desktop RTX 4090 enjoy and FHD, QHD, and 4K resolutions, so is undoubtedly price gazing.
(*18*)(*3*)[embedded content](*17*)
Anyway, that’s about it for this transient article, however search for updates within the close to long term when we get to check 4K gaming functionality on extra 4090 notebooks and a few mid-level 4080 and 4070 platforms as neatly.
Within the intervening time, I’m curious about studying your ideas at the Nvidia RTX 4090 Pc chip and whether or not that is price getting for 4K gaming as of late.
Allow 48h for review and removal.