Razer Blade 18 review (2023 generation – i9, RTX 4070)

With the Razer Blade 16 out of the best way, now I will be able to center of attention at the new Razer Blade 18 which I’ve had for over a few weeks now.

I’ve been in a position to get a just right affect of it too because it stocks some nice similarities with its smaller brother.

The important thing to this instrument is should you’re prepared to hold one thing this huge round.  The Razer Blade 17 used to be a bit of giant for many of us as it’s, and this more recent one, in truth, is even a bit of larger.

However if you recover from that, it’s a sexy implausible instrument, identical to the Blade 16.  In many ways, it’s even higher, particularly in regard to the sound of the speakers and the display screen high quality.  I’m no longer explicit about having laptops this huge, however If I needed to lift one round, this is able to most definitely be on the height of my checklist.

Listed here are the impressions I were given after the usage of this Blade 18 for a couple of weeks.

Specifications sheet as reviewed – Razer Blade 18

Razer Blade 18 (2023)
Display screen18 inch, 2560×1600 px, IPS, 240 Hz, 3ms, MUX transfer, 100% DCI-P3
ProcessorIntel i9-13950HX, 24 core, 32 threads (5.5 GHz max)
VideoIntel Iris Xe + Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 with 8GB of DDR6 VRAM
Reminiscence32 GB DDR5 5600Mhz (2x 16GB DIMMS)
Garage1x 1TB M.2 NVMe gen 4(SSSTC) + additional slot
ConnectivityIntel AX211 Wifi 6E with Bluetooth 5.2
Portsleft: DC-in, 2X USB 3.2 Gen 2 Kind A, 1x USB3.2 Gen 2 Kind C, headphone/mic combo, 2.5Gb ethernet
appropriate: lock, HDMI 2.1, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Kind A, 1x USB Kind C with Thunderbolt 4, UHS-II SD Card reader
Battery91.7 Wh, 280 W GaN charger
Measurement400 mm or 15.74” (w) x 275.4 mm or 10.84” (d) x 21.9 mm or .86” (h)
Weight3.2 kg (7.05 lbs)
Extrasbacklit keyboard(RGB), HUGE trackpad, 5MP webcam with IR, 6x speakers, vapor chamber cooling

If within the extra compact 16-inch type, my overview of the Razer Blade 16 could also be to be had over right here.

Design and building

Just like the Blade 16, the brand new Blade 18 is a wholly new chassis.  So far as this elegance of laptops is going, it’s reasonably skinny, however is an important build up in just about each and every different size when in comparison to the Razer Blade 17 from final yr.  That is to deal with the 18” 16:10 show and shape issue.

Realistically, I don’t understand an excessive amount of of a distinction in dealing with when evaluating it to the Blade 17.  Each are giant laptops, so it’s difficult to simply plop any place until you might have plentiful area at the table.  However the added pound of heft surely is price noting at the Blade 18, making it Razer’s heaviest laptop so far.  This must be no wonder at this way issue, despite the fact that.

For what’s price, right here’s how this Blade 18 appears to be like subsequent to the Blade 16 type.


Reality is, it’s a truly well-built laptop with a large number of robust facets to the chassis that make it really feel nearly indestructible in many ways.  The unibody design at this measurement may be very superb and stops any extraordinary flex that you may see in competitor 17 or 18 inch laptops that dare pass this skinny.

The highest of the instrument is precisely the similar as each and every different Razer laptop – an aluminum lid with a black matte anodized end, giving it the similar constant glance throughout all of the fashions.  Sadly, this additionally method it’s a fingerprint magnet, which turns into very obtrusive even after a few days of use.  You’ll both wish to simply include it and let the oils even themselves out through the years or purchase a pores and skin, since the consistent cleansing gets previous after a couple of weeks.

The Razer blade brand ornaments the middle of the lid, as same old.  The sunshine may also be grew to become off in Synapse if desired, which is typically the very first thing I do when I am getting those laptops since I’m no longer a fan of inexperienced lighting fixtures on my instrument.  Take into account to do it each on battery and on persistent as a result of there are two settings for it.

Opening the lid continues to be a one-finger gesture, but it surely takes a bit of extra effort in this greater display screen.  Comprehensible on account of the hinge energy and the load of the display screen – what’s vital is it’s a one hand process.  Most effective minor grievance I’ve is the cutout is a bit of small, but it surely’s no other than ahead of – it’s all the time been this fashion.

Beneath the hood is an overly huge 18” matte panel that has some very small bezels on all four facets.  Smart decision right here and I straight away respect the truth Razer stepped it up and joined the 16:10 shape issue membership, like everybody else.  That enormous backside bezel used to be getting more or less stale.

The keyboard and trackpad will probably be coated within the subsequent sections.  However on all sides of the keyboard we have now up-firing speakers, for a complete of six in general.  This can be a very welcome growth from the final type I reviewed, and I’m excited to look how those speakers carry out.


As for the IO, it’s nearly similar to what I noticed at the Razer Blade 16 simply a few weeks in the past, aside from there’s an additional Ethernet port at the left-hand aspect.  Additionally at the left, there’s the usual persistent adapter this is proprietary to Razer.  In entrance of that, there are two USB-A slots and a unmarried USB-C slot that helps Thunderbolt 4 and PD charging 3.0.  This helps as much as 100W adapters too.  Finally, there’s a headphone/microphone combo jack.

At the right-hand aspect, there’s a normal Kensington lock adopted via an HDMI 2.1 port.  There’s some other USB-A port and an extra UBC-C port, which additionally helps Thunderbolt 4 and PD charging.  After all, there’s a full-sized SD card reader.

The ground panel has plentiful vents for all three consumption lovers.  There also are a few huge footpads that give you the spacing essential to permit airflow.  At the corners, there also are a pair extra grills however those are reserved for the additional downward-facing speakers.

back 1

Taking the ground cover is beautiful simple equipped you might have the proper Torx driver.  All you want to do is take away all of the screws and the cover pops appropriate off.  Beneath the cover, you get direct get entry to to each M.2 slots and the two Ram slots, if you make a decision to switch any of them.

You’ll additionally alternate out the Wifi adapter if desired, even supposing this one is beautiful nice as it’s.  We additionally get a just right take a look at the lovers which can be very huge and are flanking all sides of a giant vapor chamber.  A 3rd fan is situated between the battery cells and looks to just stay that direct house cool.


The final noteworthy side of the insides is the speaker array.  You’ll see the bigger speakers at the backside corners, however it sounds as if that the upward-facing speakers are a bit of smaller.  I didn’t flip them over to get a just right glance, however I’m guessing the driver has about the similar sized speaker because the downward-facing drivers, plus a tiny tweeter.  I’m no longer announcing that is dangerous – it’s simply smaller than I used to be anticipating bearing in mind the upward grills are so huge.


In any case, this is similar stellar design as all the time.  When you’ve had a Razer Blade ahead of, that is not anything new, because the design is principally the similar as ahead of handiest in a brand new shape issue.  There are possibly thinner competition to be had, however I might argue they most definitely aren’t as robust as this laptop, which in itself is beautiful vital with regards to dealing with a 7lb chassis.

Keyboard and trackpad

Identical to with the smaller Blade 16, there are not any surprises right here at the Razer Blade 18 with the keyboard.  It’s principally the very same as the former type or even has the similar structure because the Blade 16.

I’m beautiful positive they’re the similar keyboards, if truth be told.  I didn’t see a unmarried distinction in my typing, with the exception that my wrists have been a bit of extra pleased with some extra genuine property to put them down at the palm leisure.  However total, I do like this keyboard.  The keys have a brief keystroke, however the comments is respectable and the keycaps are rather huge.

The keyboard has Chroma RGB backlighting which to nowadays continues to be my favourite RGB implementation throughout all laptops.  Synapse has very good instrument to program the colours on your liking and there also are some neat little results Razer provides that the majority competition don’t even come with reference to.


The trackpad in this new Blade 18 is enormous.  It’s the similar measurement as what’s at the Blade 16 too.  However for some reason why, it didn’t get in my means in this type as badly, which I discovered more or less extraordinary.

The one factor I will be able to suppose is I most definitely position the laptop on my lap in a different way in this greater type, which alters my arm and wrist place.  Both that or they up to date the palm rejection already.  Both means, I didn’t get any unintentional trackpad actions as I did only a few weeks in the past at the Blade 16.

The efficiency in this trackpad is solely as just right as any of the Blades during the last a number of years.  In different phrases, it’s just about best possible.  Monitoring at the glass floor supplies a easy and correct reaction at the mouse pointer.  Multi-touch gestures are simple to do, particularly since there’s a ton of area at the trackpad.

The trackpad could also be clickable principally all over on it.  It’s a stiff click on, which is most definitely for the most productive bearing in mind it will get unintentionally clicked differently via your fingers.  However the suitable click on may be very a long way down and to the suitable than on any conventional trackpad you may well be used to.  If it have been me, I might adapt to the usage of unmarried and double faucets moderately than clicking the trackpad.

Display screen

The type I’ve available has an 18-inch 240Hz 2560 x 1600 px answer display screen.  It’s an IPS variant made via AU Optronics.  To be blunt, it’s an out of this world display screen as there’s just about not anything to whinge about.  The viewing angles are close to best possible, the colours are colourful, and the full brightness is ready as just right because it will get.

The one grievance I’ve with this panel is with the backlight bleed.  It’s conventional for IPS panels to have this factor, particularly at the edges of the display screen.  However in this type, the backlight bleed is if truth be told within the middle height of the display screen, which is solely undeniable bizarre to me.  Realistically despite the fact that, I handiest spotted it on a fully darkish display screen, which may be very rare, thus making it a minor grievance.

I did get an opportunity to make use of my Xrite instrument to measure the display screen specs.  Right here’s what I were given:

  • Panel HardwareID: AUO B180QAN01.0 (AUO46A7)
  • Protection: 146.7% sRGB, 103.9% DCI-P3, 101.0% AdobeRGB;
  • Measured gamma: 2.2;
  • Max brightness in the midst of the display screen: 530 cd/m2
  • Distinction at max brightness: 1205:1
  • Local white level: round 6860 Ok;
  • Black on max brightness: 0.44 cd/m2

The panel defaults to 240Hz however you’ll transfer it in Synapse to be 60Hz when you want it.  You’ll additionally set it to routinely transfer to 60Hz whilst you pass on battery, which may be very useful. 240Hz is best possible for gaming despite the fact that and it compliments the GPU and display screen answer completely.

You most probably gained’t want the rest higher, however there’s no 4k panel for this type.  It’s too dangerous too as a result of you almost certainly would be capable of understand the adaptation between QHD and 4k at this display screen measurement. Possibly…

Regardless, that is the suitable display screen selection for this laptop.  FHD is old-fashioned at 18” and those RTX 4000 GPUs aren’t truly in a position for 4k, apart from the RTX 4090.  It is helping that there’s actually not anything to whinge about with the panel itself, because it’s vibrant, filled with colour, and has a quick refresh fee.  The one factor left is possibly OLED, however realistically that is just right sufficient!

{Hardware} and function

Our check type is a mid-specced configuration of the early-2023 Razer Blade 18, constructed on an Intel Core i9-13950HX processor, 32 GB of DDR5-5600 reminiscence in twin channel, 1 TB of rapid SSD garage, and twin graphics: the Nvidia RTX 4070 dGPU with 8 GB of vRAM and the UHD iGPU built-in throughout the Intel processor.

The Core i9-13950HX is a Raptor Lake thirteenth gen HX processor with a hybrid design, with 8 Efficiency Cores, 16 Potency Cores, and 32 Overall Threads.  It’s paired with rapid reminiscence (DDR5 overclocked at 5600 MHz) and gen4 garage.

The GeForce RTX 4070 is a mid-tier dGPU within the Nvidia RTX 4000 Ade Lovelace sequence, a pair steps down from the top-tier RTX 4090 Pc variant.

You gained’t be disillusioned with the device efficiency in this one – it’s just about overkill for all of the day by day duties.  They simply provide the i9 possibility which is okay – as a result of why hassle placing the rest in there if the highest CPU may also be saved cool sufficient and runs correctly.

The SSD is made via SSSTC and is 1TB.  I don’t have a lot enjoy with this pressure, however after seeing a pace check, it’s beautiful very similar to most of the upper-tiered NVMe drives available in the market.  Gadget boot time used to be very good and I didn’t have any court cases in regards to the load instances on any of the video games I performed.

As discussed previous, the RAM, SSDs, and WiFi module are simply available and upgradeable in this design.


Synapse can be utilized to switch the ability profiles and modify the CPU and GPU persistent limits in line with what your wishes are.  It additionally impacts how a lot warmth is generated and how briskly the ones lovers will blow to stay the instrument cool.  Right here’s a chart that presentations the seen TDP/TGP I’ve observed in every persistent mode:

SilentBalancedMax settings in CustomizedBattery

Let’s dig into the checking out now.

First off, let’s pass over the CPU sustained efficiency at the to be had profiles, within the Cinebench R15 loop check.

The i9-13950HX on this Blade 18 must run at ~120W sustained at Max Settings, but it surely does no longer. In reality, the ability fluctuates between 140W and 50W, inflicting a large variation in effects, as proven beneath. No longer positive what’s happening right here, as I haven’t spotted the rest of this type at the Blade 16 – extra in this in just a little.

The Balanced profile, alternatively, plays as anticipated and is so much quieter, but additionally aggressively limits the CPU in this sort of load. The Silent profile is much more power-capped and quieter. Main points beneath.


And right here’s the HWInfo log appearing the adaptation in CPU persistent and frequencies right through this check.


For what’s price, the i9-13950HX within the Blade 16 carried out completely strong on this check, but it surely capped the sustained persistent at round 110W. Right here’s a chart of the Blade 16 and Blade 18 subsequent to a few different high-tier Core i9 HX laptops of the 2023 technology.


All in all, I’d be expecting Razer in an effort to deal with this habits with later instrument tweaks and be offering strong CPU efficiency with the retail fashions. Don’t put out of your mind that our unit is an previous overview pattern, and that may be the cause of those findings on this explicit high-CPU load check.

Listed here are one of the vital artificial benchmarks I’ve taken.

For all checking out, I left complex Optimus on, which as it should be decided on the dGPU as wanted.  On this spherical of checking out, I set the CPU and GPU to max in Synapse.  Right here have been my leads to this mode:

  • 3DMark 13 – Fireplace Strike: 25675 (Graphics – 28551, Physics – 39123);
  • 3DMark 13 – Time Secret agent: 12157 (Graphics – 11815, CPU – 14550);
  • 3DMark 13 –CPU profile: max – 12644 16 – 9641, 8 – 7555, 4 – 4227, 2 – 2242, 1 -1152
  • 3DMark 13 – Port Royal (RTX) Graphics: 7107;
  • 3DMark 13 – Velocity Means: 2814;
  • Uniengine Superposition – 1080p Excessive: 6993;
  • Uniengine Superposition – 1080p Medium: 21331;
  • GeekBench 5: Unmarried-Core: 2749, Multi-core: 16714;
  • CineBench R15: OpenGL 274.06 fps, CPU 4496 cb, CPU Unmarried Core 300 cb;
  • CineBench R23: CPU 28619 pts, CPU Unmarried Core 2053 pts;
  • SPECviewperf 2020 – 3DSMax: 95.69;
  • SPECviewperf 2020 – Catia: 64.94;
  • SPECviewperf 2020 – Creo: 110.73;
  • SPECviewperf 2020 – Power: 40.86;
  • SPECviewperf 2020 – Maya: 356.98;
  • SPECviewperf 2020 – Scientific: 38.11;
  • SPECviewperf 2020 – SNX: 21.92;
  • SPECviewperf 2020 – SW: 246.67.

I’m no longer seeing the rest flawed with the CPU rankings in those benchmarks. And the GPU rankings are a lot as anticipated for a 4070.

Subsequent I set the mode to Balanced in Synapse.  Right here have been my effects:

  • 3DMark 13 – Fireplace Strike: 22673 (Graphics – 27343, Physics – 27154);
  • 3DMark 13 – Time Secret agent: 11407 (Graphics – 11462, CPU – 11107);
  • 3DMark 13 –CPU profile: max – 7732 16 – 6638, 8 – 5234, 4 – 3502, 2 – 2098, 1 -1146
  • 3DMark 13 – Port Royal (RTX) Graphics: 7087;
  • 3DMark 13 – Velocity Means: 2791;
  • Uniengine Superposition – 1080p Excessive: 6971;
  • Uniengine Superposition – 1080p Medium: 21303;
  • GeekBench 5: Unmarried-Core: 2679, Multi-core: 13069;
  • CineBench R15: OpenGL 251.28 fps, CPU 2617 cb, CPU Unmarried Core 294 cb;
  • CineBench R23: CPU 16148 pts, CPU Unmarried Core 1970 pts;

After all, listed below are my effects after switching to Quiet mode:

  • 3DMark 13 – Fireplace Strike: 18351 (Graphics – 25788, Physics – 20052);
  • 3DMark 13 – Time Secret agent: 10109 (Graphics – 10849, CPU – 7291);
  • 3DMark 13 –CPU profile: max – 5744 16 – 4503, 8 – 3725, 4 – 2735, 2 – 1744, 1 -1031;
  • 3DMark 13 – Port Royal (RTX) Graphics: 6817;
  • 3DMark 13 – Velocity Means: 2718;
  • Uniengine Superposition – 1080p Excessive: 6781;
  • Uniengine Superposition – 1080p Medium: 20581;
  • GeekBench 5: Unmarried-Core: 2574, Multi-core: 10117;
  • CineBench R15: OpenGL 235.47 fps, CPU 1550 cb, CPU Unmarried Core 268 cb;
  • CineBench R23: CPU 12406 pts, CPU Unmarried Core 1931 pts;

Those are just right effects however I used to be a bit of eliminate via how little distinction there’s in GPU efficiency between the Most settings and Balanced.  Seems the GPU realistically handiest maxes out at 115W in real-use, despite the fact that it reportedly can pass as much as 140W.  And in maximum exams, it used to be if truth be told round 100W, very an identical if no longer the similar as on Balanced.

I did achieve out to Razer about this, who additionally reached out to Nvidia to analyze.  Seems that is standard.  The Ada Lovelace framework will examine the most productive wattage to offer in line with the burden or sport getting used, so wattage will range with this GPU/CPU combo and can default to the most productive method to offer ok efficiency.

The CPU, alternatively, advantages from extra persistent on Max Settings, and this presentations off within the effects.

Gaming efficiency

With that out of the best way, I did some extra checking out with video games.  I took those readings in numerous efficiency choices in Synapse:

Core i9-13950HX + RTX 4070 120-140WQHD+ – Max settingsQHD+ – BalancedQHD+ – Quiet
Battlefield V
(DX 12, Extremely Preset, Ray-Tracing OFF)
124 fps avg, 65 fps 1% low116 fps avg, 32 fps 1% low109 fps avg, 30 fps 1% low
Battlefield V
(DX 12, Extremely Preset, Ray-Tracing ON, DLSS Off)
64 fps avg, 48 fps 1% low56 fps avg, 45 fps 1% low55 fps avg, 15 fps 1% low
Battlefield V
(DX 12, Extremely Preset, Ray-Tracing ON, DLSS On)
73 fps avg, 51 fps 1% low73 fps avg, 28 fps 1% low68 fps avg, 31 fps 1% low
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
(DX 11, Extremely Preset, AA: TAAU, Hairworks Off)
83 fps avg, 19 fps 1% low89 fps avg, 37 fps 1% low85 fps avg, 43 fps 1% low
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
(DX 12, Extremely Preset, AA: TAAU, Hairworks Off)
98 fps avg, 59 fps 1% low96 fps avg, 46 fps 1% low93 fps avg, 64 fps 1% low
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
(DX 12, Extremely Preset, AA: TAAU, Hairworks Off, RT: High quality, DLSS Body Gen Off)
34 fps avg, 13 fps 1% low28 fps avg, 20 fps 1% low28 fps avg, 17 fps 1% low
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
(DX 12, Extremely Preset, AA: TAAU, Hairworks Off, RT: High quality, DLSS Body Gen On)
39 fps avg, 20 fps 1% low39 fps avg, 24 fps 1% low37 fps avg, 3 fps 1% low
Horizon 0 Morning time
112 fps avg, 83 fps 1% low108 fps avg, 74 fps 1% low98 fps avg, 62 fps 1% low
(Extremely, Ray Tracing On) DLSS Off
32 fps avg, 23 fps 1% low35 fps avg, 20 fps 1% low25 fps avg, 22 fps 1% low
(Extremely, Ray Tracing On) DLSS Auto w/ Body technology
82 fps avg, 69 fps 1% low80 fps avg, 67 fps 1% low73 fps avg, 51 fps 1% low
(Extremely, Ray Tracing Off)
60 fps avg, 46 fps 1% low56 fps avg, 38 fps 1% low53 fps avg, 30 fps 1% low
(Prime preset)
89 fps avg, 42 fps 1% low93 fps avg, 42 fps 1% low87 fps avg, 39 fps 1% low
Elden Ring
(Max settings, QHD, without borders
60 fps avg, 40 fps 1% low60 fps avg, 43 fps 1% low57 fps avg, 41 fps 1% low
Ultimate Delusion 7 remake
(Max settings, QHD)
109 fps avg, 51 fps 1% low109 fps avg, 41 fps 1% low101 fps avg, 36 fps 1% low

Once more, just right effects right here, however the distinction in effects between Balanced mode and Max settings may be very minimum.  And whilst you issue within the distinction it makes to the temperatures and the fan noise, the minimum efficiency spice up is rarely price it.

The excellent news is Balanced mode or even Quiet mode effects are beautiful respectable with regards to gaming.  It must be identified despite the fact that that those effects aren’t greatly other than the gaming effects I’ve observed with the RTX 3070 Ti.  In reality, repeating a few of these exams on my Asus ROG Glide x16 with 3070 Ti led to very an identical effects (I’ll element this extra in some other article quickly).  The one get advantages to the RTX 4070 is the addition of DLSS3 body technology, which the 3000 sequence lacks.

As it’s despite the fact that, the consequences are what they’re.  And now that you simply see this, you’ll obviously see the adaptation I were given within the 4080 model of the Blade 16 to look how profitable that higher-tier GPU is. And also you’ll additionally in finding effects for the same RTX 4090 configuration within the Scar 18 overview. The 4080/4090 are greatly dearer in this Blade 18 (and different fashions, in fact), however should you’re planning to do the rest instead of informal gaming in Quiet mode, the 4080 improve a minimum of may well be price it to you.

At the flipside, if Quiet gaming is a factor you need, evaluating the ones effects presentations minimum get advantages to the RTX 4080.  On this case, in all probability the RTX 4070 presentations its true price and may well be the simpler pick out.

To summarize, I’m comfortable with the efficiency on this bundle and I feel maximum who’re searching for an impressive all-purpose laptop and gaming system of this measurement can be proud of how nicely this Blade 18 plays on this mid-specced variant.  I simply anticipated a bit of extra at the GPU efficiency, however that’s handiest as a result of I’m evaluating it to the identical GPU of the former technology.

Emissions (noise, warmth), Connectivity, and speakers

On this up to date type, Razer caught with the vapor chamber and two very huge lovers to tackle all of the thermal wishes.  This cooling module labored nicely up to now, so it’s no wonder that they only saved the whole thing constant.  That is very similar to what used to be observed within the Blade 16, just a little larger.


There’s, on the other hand, an additional 3rd fan which is situated within the battery house, beneath the trackpad.  This surely assists in keeping that house cooler, however I don’t suppose it has any impact on the remainder of the internals.

I ran my conventional check with Horizon 0 Morning time, the place I run the sport for a longer length at every persistent profile.  The intent is to measure the diversities in temperatures in addition to ambient noise ranges from the lovers.  Test it out:

ModeGuide (Max settings)BalancedQuiet
CPU temps79C avg with 100C spike69C avg with 87C spike70C avg with 73C spike
GPU temps69C avg69C avg69C avg
Avg fan noise after stabilized temps49 dB40 dB36 dB
Sport efficiency112 fps avg, 83 fps 1% low108 fps avg, 74 fps 1% low98 fps avg, 62 fps 1% low

Even in max settings, the fan noise manages to stick below 50dB, which is beautiful just right I assume.  However with the CPU cranked as much as complete persistent, the spikes in temperatures stand up to the three-digit mark, which is a bit of relating to.  The typical CPU temps don’t seem to be as alarming despite the fact that and the GPU temps are if truth be told superb.  Bearing in mind the GPU wattage is handiest 100w for this sport, it’s no wonder.

Balanced mode carried out rather well and makes extra sense than the utmost settings.  An 87C CPU spike is rarely the rest to be desirous about.  The typical temperatures are simply undeniable very good, despite the fact that.  I may just additionally handle 40dB fan noise on a standard gaming consultation.  And let’s no longer put out of your mind that switching to this mode slightly impacts the gaming efficiency when in comparison to max settings.

However Quiet mode is similarly superior.  No longer handiest does the noise degree drop a couple of decibels, however the efficiency continues to be nearly as just right.  I feel if I owned this system, I’d most definitely leap from side to side between Quiet mode and Balanced to look if the efficiency used to be greatly other in my actions and video games, and would then simply decide on Quiet if it used to be just right sufficient.

Chassis temps are about what you’d be expecting from a steel unibody gaming rig.  For traditional day by day use, the instrument warms up a bit of, however not anything to whinge about.  The lovers typically don’t even kick on both because the huge heatsink turns out in an effort to fritter away lots of the warmth during the chassis.

Gaming truly provides a large number of warmth and if you let it increase for some time, the chassis will get truly sizzling.  That is particularly so beneath and in opposition to the middle.  I took some thermal photographs so you’ll see the level of it.



So far as connectivity is going, the Wifi reception is solely undeniable very good in this system.  Taking my conventional pace check from 20+toes from my router led to 800 Mbps, which is ready as just right as I’ve ever observed.  No drops in connection both – I all the time had a strong connection all through my use.

There’s additionally Bluetooth 5.2 in this Wifi card, which additionally labored completely for me.  I used each a Bluetooth controller for some video games and my Airpods Professional.  Neither had any problems connecting or staying attached.

The speakers at the new Blade 18 also are superb.  This yr they carried out two upward-facing tweeters and 4 “subs” with two dealing with up and the opposite two down.  The time period subs is handiest compared to the tweeters, as a result of they create all of the mids and lows, however they aren’t specifically just right at replicating natural bass.

I ran my same old check music and were given a most amplitude of 75dB(A), which is reasonable.  However the high quality of the sound is excellent bearing in mind the selection of speakers and the remoted vary of the tweeters.  I a lot moderately most well-liked the sound of those speakers over those I latterly noticed at the Blade 16.

In reality, I used to be in a position to check them aspect via aspect with that type and with my Asus Glide x16.  After operating via plenty of songs on every, undoubtedly the Blade 18 sounded the most productive, with my x16 being a detailed 2d.  The Blade 16 simply sounded tinny when compared, however understand that I additionally imagine the ones speakers to be beautiful just right.  So I’d say those Blade 18 speakers are spectacular.

The very last thing to say is the webcam.  This yr is a 5MPx shooter, however I’m no longer positive it’s the rest to gloat about despite the fact that.  The well-lit pictures are respectable and supply just right colour, however lack sharpness.  The low-light pictures have an adequate gentle correction a minimum of.  Indisputably no longer one thing you’ll wish to professionally circulate with, but it surely’ll get you via.

The digital camera could also be IR and helps Home windows Hi, which labored flawlessly all through my use.  Like I all the time do, it used to be arrange at first and used completely to unencumber the laptop – I had 0 issues.  Sadly, there’s no webcam shutter as I noticed at the Blade 16.  I am hoping they upload this to long term fashions.

Battery lifestyles

The Razer Blade 18 has a 92Whr battery which is a average build up from the 82Whr within the Razer Blade 17 final yr.  I took did my same old sequence of exams with brightness set to 30% which is ready 110 nits.  Right here’s what I were given:

  • 14.4 W (~6 h 22 min of use)– idle, Quiet mode with battery saver on, display screen at 0%, Wi-Fi ON, backlighting off;
  • 20.9 W (~4 h 23 min of use)– textual content enhancing in Phrase/Excel with gentle web use, display screen at 30%, Wi-Fi ON;
  • 20.3 W (~4 h 31 min of use)– 1440p 60hz Youtube fullscreen in Chrome, display screen at 30%, Wi-Fi ON;
  • 20.4 W (~4 h 30 min of use)– 1080p HBO Max fullscreen video in Chrome, display screen at 30%, Wi-Fi ON;
  • 28.4 W (~3 h 14 min of use)– heavy surfing in Chrome,  display screen at 30%, Wi-Fi ON;
  • 62.8 W (~1 h 28 min of use)– Gaming – Witcher 3 60fps, display screen at 50%, Wi-Fi ON.

First rate battery lifestyles needless to say, but it surely’s not so good as you’d be expecting for having one of these giant battery.  The issue most probably lies with the display screen measurement, which is most definitely rather less environment friendly than the 16” model.  The CPU could also be an impressive Intel variant so we’re going to look some spikes in battery drainage the extra you tax the CPU.  Regardless, those effects are applicable for a gaming laptop.

Word that the RTX 4070 and 4060 fashions include a 280W persistent brick as an alternative of the 330W brick I were given at the Blade 16 with RTX 4080.  It’s a GaN charger, so it’s ultra-portable when in comparison to the standard persistent bricks of an identical wattage.  And this brick is considerably smaller than the 330W GaN charger I had simply a few weeks in the past, so there’s some extra portability concerned with the lower-tiered GPUs.  No longer that it truly issues with an 18” laptop…


Worth and availability – Razer Blade 18

Fashions vary from $2899 to $4499 this yr, relying most commonly at the GPU of selection.  The type I’ve available is priced at $3199.  No longer handiest are those truly excessive costs normally, however this could also be $200 greater than the in a similar fashion priced Blade 16 at an equivalent GPU specification.

I’m rather less the Blade 18 costs than the Blade 16.  I am getting that it’s larger, however I truly simply am no longer positive I see $200 extra in price only at the display screen measurement distinction.  I do favor the extra transportable 16” shape issue, despite the fact that, so in all probability that is affecting my total impressions.

Regardless, if an 18” laptop is ready in stone for you, you’re going to need to shell out some huge cash if you select the Razer Blade 18.  You’re truly purchasing the tough design greater than the {hardware} that’s contained inside, however this is typically the case with Razer laptops.  If in case you have this sort of cash to spend, you almost certainly gained’t be disillusioned.

So, if you wish to pull the cause in this one, you’ll in finding the Razer Blade 18 each on Amazon and on Razer’s web page.

Ultimate Ideas – 2023 Razer Blade 18

I surely loved my time with the Blade 18.  It’s an overly succesful laptop with high-end specifications and a construct high quality this is arguably as just right because it will get.  I wouldn’t say I appreciated it up to the smaller Blade 16, but it surely’s handiest on account of the smaller measurement of the 16-inch type, which I surely favor.

However should you’re in particular searching for one thing greater, there are a few benefits that this type has over the Blade 16.  The bigger display screen is only a excitement to have a look at, particularly because it’s just about 100 nits brighter.  Ethernet is surely a plus, despite the fact that I rarely apply it to laptops, and the 5 MPx digital camera is sweet to have, even supposing the standard isn’t a lot over the 2 MPx digital camera on different laptops.  And let’s no longer put out of your mind the standard of the sound in this type.

Reality is, there’s little to whinge about at the Blade 18.  Some small nits I found out have been the backlight bleed and the loss of a webcam shutter.  If that’s all I will be able to truly whinge about, then we’re in beautiful just right form.  In fact, there are the power problems that I say with each and every Razer laptop, such because the sparkling brand and the fingerprints.

I is also essential of the gaming efficiency when evaluating the RTX 4070 and the RTX 3070 Ti.  However that’s no longer truly Razer’s fault – they’re simply imposing the GPU choices right here, and it’s what it’s.  And it’s simply mounted via simply opting for a special GPU.

Backside level, the professionals a long way outweigh the cons right here and I’m pleased with what Razer is providing this yr with this new type.  They saved the choices easy sufficient, the place all it’s important to fear about is what GPU you wish to have.  Paired with the i9 CPU, you’re having a look to have a lovely gaming enjoy. With a QHD+ display screen, just about any GPU possibility will probably be wonderful equipped you put the graphics settings correctly.

In fact, the higher-end GPU choices are truly going to price you and that’s a hurdle with this type.  Even the 4060 type is rather pricey whilst you evaluate it with the contest.  That’s been a factor with Razer for years, despite the fact that – so not anything new there.

I’m positive that the Blade 18 will discover a house with the area of interest team that craves these kinds of laptops.  And if that’s you, I’m curious what you bring to mind this yr’s Razer Blade 18 type.  As same old, if any person has any questions on it, be happy to remark beneath and I’ll attempt to lend a hand out.

razer blade 18 main

Disclaimer: Our content material is reader-supported. If you purchase via one of the vital hyperlinks on our web page, we might earn a fee. Phrases.

Derek Sullivan, author at

Evaluation via: Derek Sullivan
Derek Sullivan – Evaluation Editor. Along with being a tech fanatic, I’ve a profession as a Biomedical Engineer. I experience taking issues aside, working out how they paintings, and discovering techniques to cause them to higher. My different spare time activities come with spending time with my circle of relatives, “Do it your self” tasks equivalent to house automation, and operating.

Publishing request and DMCA complains contact -support[eta]laptopfrog.com.
Allow 48h for review and removal.