The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K contention is a struggle of flagships for the highest-end of the gaming marketplace, however the chips take tremendously other approaches to serving up main efficiency. The Core i9-13900K wields Intel’s (*11*)Thirteenth-Gen Raptor Lake x86 hybrid structure to sq. off in opposition to AMD’s chiplet-based (*16*)Zen 4 Ryzen 7000 chips, however AMD has a trick up its sleeve — the 2nd-Gen Three-D V-Cache tech, which fuses on a Three-D-stacked cache chiplet atop the processor to ship market-leading gaming efficiency. Those two essentially other approaches have shaken up our listing of the perfect CPUs for gaming, however every means has its respective strengths.
AMD’s $699 Ryzen 9 7950X3D is geared in particular for players taking a look to blast via CPU-limited video games whilst nonetheless having the threaded heft of 16 cores that stay aggressive within the heaviest of productiveness workloads. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D does lag competition in some productiveness apps because of the tradeoffs related to the Three-D chip-stacking tech, and it does not boost up all video games similarly. Alternatively, one factor is sure — it’s the quickest gaming chip in the marketplace.
The $589 Intel Core i9-13900K is Intel’s quickest gaming processor, and whilst it is not relatively as rapid as AMD’s Ryzen 9 7950X3D in gaming, it has a miles friendlier price ticket and serves up ultra-competitive efficiency in each gaming and productiveness apps. Intel additionally continues to fortify DDR4 reminiscence to supply a less-expensive trail for developers, decreasing the bar for access to flagship efficiency even additional. In the meantime, AMD’s determination to fortify handiest DDR5 has confirmed to be a pricing ache level.
The other strengths of those two chips make for a hard determination in case you are taking a look to select one on your subsequent high-end construct. Beneath now we have taken the Core i9-13900K vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D contention via a six-round faceoff to look which chips take the crown in our gaming and application benchmarks, in conjunction with different key standards like energy intake and pricing. Let’s have a look at how they stack up.
Options and Specs: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K
Swipe to scroll horizontally
(*20*)
Boulevard/MSRP
Cores / Threads (P+E)
P-Core Base / Spice up Clock (GHz)
E-Core Base / Spice up Clock (GHz)
Cache (L2/L3)
TDP / PBP / MTP
Reminiscence
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
$699
16 / 32
4.2 / 5.7
144MB (16+128)
120W / 162W
DDR5-5200
Core i9-13900KS
$699
24 / 32 (8+16)
3.0 / 6.0
2.2 / 4.3
68MB (32+36)
150W / 253W / 320W
DDR4-3200 / DDR5-5600
Core i9-13900K / KF
$589 (Okay) – $564 (KF)
24 / 32 (8+16)
3.0 / 5.8
2.2 / 4.3
68MB (32+36)
125W / 253W
DDR4-3200 / DDR5-5600
AMD’s $699 Ryzen 9 7950X3D comes packing 16 Zen 4 cores and the corporate’s second-gen Three-D V-Cache tech that unlocks 128MB of L3 cache, a combo that delivers the quickest gaming efficiency to be had in the marketplace. The 7950X3D has the similar underlying design because the Ryzen 9 7950X with a central I/O die and two eight-core compute chiplets that supply a complete of 16 cores and 32 threads.
In contrast to the usual 7950X, one of the 7950X3D’s compute chiplets comes with an extra Three-D-stacked L3 cache and boosts to 5.25 GHz. In the meantime, the ‘same old’ compute chiplet with out cache boosts to 5.7 GHz, the similar as the usual 7950X (main points right here). Regardless of the decrease frequency, the cache-equipped chiplet supplies the most productive efficiency for video games, whilst the quicker chiplet is perfect for productiveness packages. As such, AMD designed an cutting edge new driver that is helping steer threads for various kinds of workloads to the right kind chiplet.
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D brings all the facilities we might be expecting from a contemporary processor, together with fortify for DDR5, PCIe 5.0, and the most recent USB connectivity requirements. AMD has additionally added built-in graphics for a fundamental show out for the primary time, which is a plus if you wish to have to troubleshoot. You’ll be able to see our iGPU checking out right here.
The 7950X3D sips energy — it has a base TPD of 120W and a max 162W PPT, which is 68W not up to the 170W/230W ranking for the usual 7950X. The decrease energy threshold will lead to much less efficiency in heavy packages, however you’ll be able to nonetheless want to plan for a 240mm to 280mm AIO (or higher) for the most productive efficiency.
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D calls for an AM5 motherboard, so dear DDR5 reminiscence is the best choice. Sadly, DDR5 is still a lot more costly than DDR4 reminiscence. Granted, that pricing power is not as a lot of a attention on the excessive finish, however you must issue it into your buying determination. The AM5 platform is new, so the Ryzen 7000 chips are not backward appropriate with older AM4 motherboards. Alternatively, AMD will fortify the AM5 platform till 2025+.
AMD handiest allowed overclocking the reminiscence and Infinity Cloth for the previous-gen 5800X3D, however the 7950X3D additionally provides fortify for each the auto-overclocking Precision Spice up Overdrive (PBO) and the Curve Optimizer. Sadly, AMD nonetheless doesn’t permit direct frequency overclocking because of a voltage limitation for one of the chiplets.
Intel’s $589 sixteen-core Core i9-13900K comes with eight hyper-threaded P-cores and 16 single-threaded E-cores, for a complete of 32 threads. That is an building up of eight further E-cores over the previous-gen Core i9-12900K, equating to extra threaded horsepower. You’ll be able to additionally avoid wasting money with the $564 Core i9-13900KF, which has an identical specifications however lacks the built-in GPU.
Intel nonetheless makes use of the ‘Intel 7’ procedure node for Raptor Lake however leveraged a more recent revision of the silicon to push clock speeds greater whilst making improvements to energy potency. The P-cores include a 3.0 GHz base, however, extra importantly, a 5.8 GHz spice up that is a whopping 600 MHz building up over the prior gen. In the meantime, the E-cores now have a 3.0 GHz base (+600 MHz) and stretch as much as 4.3 GHz (+400 MHz), that means that now not handiest do you get extra E-cores, however you additionally get extra out of every core.
The Core i9-13900K may be geared up with 32MB of L3 cache and 36MB of L2 and drops into present 600-series motherboards or the brand new 700-series fashions. The chip comes with the built-in UHD Graphics 770 engine with 32 EUs that spice up as much as 1.65 GHz.
Intel’s chips now have a Processor Base Energy (PBP) worth as an alternative of a TDP metric, and a secondary Most Turbo Energy (MTP) worth that denotes the very best energy point right through spice up job. The 13900K comes with 125W PBP (base) and 253W MTP (height) energy scores, however bear in mind that the chip can at all times function on the 253W MTP when it’s underneath load, even though the real energy use will range with application depth. Intel permits complete overclockability, however handiest while you pair the chip with a Z-series motherboard.
Winner: Tie
The Core i9-13900K vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D struggle yields a tie on this class. Each chips fortify DDR5 and the PCIe 5.0 interface, that means neither has an inherent connectivity benefit.
Intel has the benefit of backward compatibility for DDR4 and the 600-series chipset, enabling lower-cost reminiscence and motherboards for worth seekers (caveats practice). Intel additionally has its Raptor Lake Refresh chips at the horizon, that means there can be one extra technology of upgrades for the LGA 1700 platform.
AMD’s new AM5 platform handiest helps dear DDR5 and carries a top rate over the Intel motherboard ecosystem, nevertheless it does have the funds for prolonged ahead compatibility — AMD plans on supporting the AM5 platform till 2025+.
Given its new hybrid structure with two forms of cores, Intel’s core counts are not without delay similar to AMDs because of their other functions. Our efficiency effects will dictate the efficiency worth of the entire designs.
(*18*)Gaming Benchmarks and Efficiency: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K
Take into account, this text is an summary of our a lot more in-depth checking out in our AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Evaluate. Beneath you’ll see the geometric imply of our gaming exams with the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K at 1080p and 1440p, with every decision cut up into its personal chart. As standard, we are checking out with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 to scale back GPU-imposed bottlenecks up to conceivable, however variations will shrink with lesser playing cards or greater resolutions.
(*17*)
Symbol 1 of 20
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D lives as much as its billing because the quickest gaming chip on the earth, beating out Intel’s flagship through spectacular margins in some titles. We additionally see the 7950X3D take a large lead within the geometric imply of our check suite, however bear in mind that the Three-D V-Cache doesn’t boost up all titles similarly. Due to this fact, you must additionally take a look at the person recreation benchmarks within the above album to evaluate the entire development.
In our checking out, the $699 Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 12% quicker than the $589 Core i9-13900K at 1080p gaming at inventory settings, and 9% quicker when the chips are overclocked. The latter ranking is discouraging for Intel — the 13900K consumes way more energy but nonetheless can not beat the 7950X3D. As a reminder, Intel launched its limited-edition Core i9-13900KS as a preemptive strike in opposition to the 7950X3D, however regardless of its spectacular 6 GHz spice up clock and massive price ticket, it provides mainly the similar gaming efficiency because the $589 Core i9-13900K. As such, it additionally falls at the back of the 7950X3D.
Whilst the 7950X3D is 12% quicker than the 13900K on this collection of titles, it additionally prices 19% extra. As discussed above, you’ll additionally equip the 13900K with DDR4 to avoid wasting much more money, however bear in mind that you’ll be able to lose a couple of proportion issues of gaming efficiency on moderate (see our checking out right here).
Shifting over to 1440p pushes the bottleneck extra in opposition to the GPU, so the variation between the chips shrinks. For instance, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 8% quicker than the Core i9-13900K at 1440p, and that shrinks to a 3% distinction after each chips are overclocked. It is logical to suppose that the majority high-end gaming techniques will use higher-resolution screens, so the variations may well be slight, however the 7950X3D offers you extra headroom for long term GPU upgrades.
Remember that enormous deltas in person recreation titles, as we see with the Ryzen 9 7950X3D, affect cumulative measurements. You’ll be able to see examples of that during titles like Microsoft Flight Simulator 2021, A long way Cry 6, and F1 2021. Our check suite closely favors the enhancements from Three-D V-Cache, so we additionally incorporated a desk under with effects from an extra five video games that we don’t in most cases check. You’ll additionally to find AMD’s personal benchmarks in a huge differ of titles on the finish of the above album to come up with an concept of efficiency beneficial properties in different titles. As with any vendor-provided benchmarks, take AMD’s slides with a grain of salt.
As at all times, the AMD vs Intel pageant can range in keeping with the name and the GPU you utilize, so it is best to make an educated determination in keeping with the forms of titles you play incessantly.
(*19*)
Swipe to scroll horizontally
(*20*)
Further Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Core i9-13900K 1080p Video games – fps
Tom’s {Hardware} – 1080p Extras
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Core i9-13900K
7950X3D vs 13900K
Grand Robbery Auto V
182.4 fps
185.5 fps
-1.7%
Undertaking Automobiles 3
357.6 fps
295 fps
+21.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
332.2 fps
274.6 fps
+21%
Borderlands 3
231.6 fps
186.4 fps
+24.3%
Horizon 0 Break of day
264.7 fps
218 fps
+21.4%
Winner: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D On moderate, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the quickest gaming chip cash should purchase. In our check suite, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 12% quicker than the Core i9-13900K at 1080p gaming and 8% quicker at 1440p. After overclocking, the ones deltas shrink to 9% and 3% at 1080p and 1440p, respectively.
Those gaming effects include a couple of caveats: The 7950X3D does not boost up all video games, and the Core i9-13900K prices 19% much less earlier than we consider its a lot decrease general platform prices. Alternatively, you’ll be able to at all times pay a disproportionate top rate for main efficiency, and on the finish of the day, a win is a win.
As at all times, we do not counsel chips on this value differ in case you are handiest involved in gaming — you’ll be able to to find lower-priced possible choices from each AMD and Intel which are a a long way higher worth for gaming. Alternatively, there’ll at all times be the ones made up our minds to construct the completely quickest gaming machine without reference to charge, and the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the quickest gaming chip lately to be had for the ones high-end builds.
In the meantime, the remainder of us must almost certainly wait to look how the eight-core $449 Ryzen 7 7800X3D fares when it arrives in April. This chip will most probably be offering just about the similar gaming efficiency because the Ryzen 9 7950X3D, however at a miles lower cost.
Productiveness Efficiency: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K
(*13*)
Symbol 1 of 11
We will boil down efficiency in productiveness apps into two huge classes: single- and multi-threaded. The primary slide above displays the geometric imply of efficiency in different of our maximum necessary exams within the single-threaded class, however remember to take a look at the expanded ends up in the above album.
The Core i9-13900K is 17% quicker than the usual Ryzen 9 7950X3D configuration in single-threaded paintings. We have now two overclocked configs right here for the 7950X3D — the auto-overclocked PBO, and PBO blended with undervolting (PBO UV). Significantly, the PBO UV config narrows the 13900K’s lead in single-threaded paintings to 11%.
Naturally, the ones efficiency deltas may not lift over to each form of workload. Alternatively, flipping during the album of check effects unearths that the Core i9-13900K excels in single-threaded paintings, which might in the long run supply snappier efficiency than the 7950X3D in mild packages. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D does lead within the AVX-512 y-cruncher benchmark, however Intel leads all different lightly-threaded benchmarks.
(*14*)
Symbol 1 of 16
The primary slide within the above album incorporates a geometrical imply of efficiency in different of our multi-threaded benchmarks. In multi-threaded paintings, the $589 Core i9-13900K is 4% quicker than the $699 Ryzen 9 7950X3D at inventory settings, and an insignificant 1% quicker after overclocking. Either one of those chips serve up a lot of efficiency in this sort of paintings, but when gaming is not as necessary and you might be on the lookout for the maximum efficiency in threaded apps, the usual Ryzen 9 7950X is the simpler selection.
Winner:Intel Core i9-13900K
The Core i9-13900K provides a extra balanced profile in each single- and multi-threaded productiveness packages than the 7950X3D, handing over cast efficiency in each disciplines. By contrast, whilst the Ryzen 9 7950X3D stays inside of placing distance in threaded packages, it loses relatively slightly of steam in single-threaded paintings. No longer handiest does that lead to slower efficiency in lighter workloads and not more responsiveness, however it might probably additionally hamstring efficiency in standard real-world productiveness workloads — those regularly come with each lightly-threaded and multi-threaded parts within the workflow, and considerably slower efficiency in both class hampers general efficiency.
AMD’s Ryzen 7950X3D does have the benefit of {hardware} acceleration to hurry AVX-512 workloads, a bonus over the 13900K in increasingly heavily-threaded duties, however those proceed to be reasonably uncommon for almost all of customers. Given its general awesome mix of efficiency in productiveness packages, the Core i9-13900K takes the win.
Overclocking: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K
We have now lengthy since reached the land of diminishing returns for overclocking the highest-end chips from AMD and Intel, just like the Ryzen 9 and Core i9 households. As a result of AMD has pulled Intel right into a dogfight for efficiency superiority at the excessive finish, a lot of the overclocking frequency headroom is rolled into same old inventory efficiency. Alternatively, there are nonetheless a minimum of some beneficial properties available, and each Intel and AMD reveal tunable parameters and complicated device overclocking utilities, like Intel’s XTU and AMD’s Ryzen Grasp.
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D does not fortify overclocking by way of the CPU multiplier, so you’ll’t trade the core clocks without delay. You additionally can not regulate CPU voltage without delay. Alternatively, you’ll overclock the reminiscence and upholstery. AMD has additionally added fortify for changing the ability limits (PPT, TDC, EDC) during the auto-overclocking Precision Spice up Overdrive (PBO) function, and you’ll additionally now undervolt the X3D chips the use of the Curve Optimizer. Those options weren’t supported at the previous-gen type. You’ll to find a lot of examples of the PBO and PBO+UV settings in our 7950X3D evaluation.
In the meantime, the Intel Core i9-13900K exposes each knob conceivable for tweaking and tuning. Alternatively, its competitive out-of-the-box energy and boosting algorithms already devour many of the overclocking headroom it’s worthwhile to reach with typical cooling. Sub-zero overclockers with unique cooling answers can achieve a lot greater with the 13900K than the 7950X3D, however that’s not as precious to the vast majority of customers.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
(*20*)
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K Overclocking Efficiency
Overclocking %age achieve over inventory
Intel Core i9-13900K @ 5.6
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D PBO
Gaming (1080p)
+5.5%
+2.65%
Unmarried-Threaded
-2.5%
+2%
Multi-Threaded
+3%
+2%
As standard, overclocking efficiency beneficial properties can boil down in your good fortune within the silicon lottery. As you’ll see above, overclocking with typical cooling for each the Intel and AMD processors ends up in reasonably minimum beneficial properties in packages. If truth be told, the 13900K in fact suffers from decrease efficiency in single-threaded paintings as a result of its 5.6 GHz overclock is not up to its inventory 5.8 GHz spice up. The Core i9-13900K does achieve 5.5% in gaming, the next proportion achieve than the 7950X3D, nevertheless it nonetheless lags at the back of the 7950X3D’s height gaming efficiency.
Winner: Tie
The payoff for overclocking is terribly restricted with as of late’s excessive finish chips. Nonetheless, each platforms have a wealth of tunable parameters for fanatics, their respective overclocking benefits, and a collection of auto-overclocking and device utilities. In fact, devoted tuners may to find higher efficiency boosts through overclocking the core, cloth, and reminiscence extra aggressively than now we have, however have in mind that you are at all times on the whims of the silicon lottery in terms of overclocking.
AMD’s Three-D V-Cache era prevents direct voltage and frequency manipulations, however AMD has unlocked reminiscence, cloth, Precision Spice up Overdrive, and undervolting by way of the Curve Optimizer, all of which mix to offer a lot of avenues for enhancing efficiency by way of quite a lot of tuning tactics. If truth be told, the 7950X3D regularly delivers a equivalent quantity of efficiency uplift because the Core i9-13900K, appearing the worth of its fairly unconventional approaches.
In the meantime, Intel provides much more overclocking capability and the very best height frequencies you’ll get from direct tuning. Alternatively, a lot of that capacity is already uncovered proper out of the field by way of the corporate’s competitive boosting applied sciences and sky-high energy limits, thus lowering its worth to informal overclockers.
(*15*)Energy Intake, Potency, and Cooling: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K
(*12*)
Symbol 1 of 13
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is amazingly energy environment friendly, drawing a long way much less energy than both the usual 7950X or the competing Core i9-13900KS, thus handing over excellent energy potency that ranks among the finest we’ve ever examined. A handy guide a rough look on the HandBrake renders-per-day-per-watt metric displays that the potency pageant is not even shut — the 7950X3D is the hand’s down winner.
AMD’s Ryzen chips have superb energy and potency metrics, however the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is much more environment friendly as it has a decrease 120W TDP ranking. This implies the chip is very similar to a 7950X working relatively above the 105W Eco Mode. By contrast, Intel’s chip consumes way more energy in each form of workload, leading to greater thermal output.
Winner: AMD
Intel has made a lot of development in lowering its energy intake metrics, however the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is a lot more energy environment friendly. No longer handiest does the 7950X3D devour a long way much less height energy, nevertheless it additionally delivers extra paintings in step with unit of energy ate up. That ends up in a win in energy intake, potency, and thermal output, in the long run providing you with a cooler and quieter machine.
Neither of those chips comes with a bundled cooler, however Intel’s greater energy intake manner you’ll be able to want extra competitive, and thus dearer, cooling to extract the height efficiency.
Pricing: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K
The Core i9-13900K has spectacular efficiency for its $598 price ticket, and you’ll even pass graphics-less to avoid wasting money with the $564 Core i9-13900KF type. That is exceptionally aggressive pricing in opposition to AMD’s $699 Ryzen 9 7950X3D, nevertheless it does lag in height gaming efficiency. Normalizing the efficiency values to a dollars-per-fps metric displays that they’re lovely carefully matched in the case of gaming worth, however as you’ll see once we issue within the general platform charge above, there are different elements at play.
Each the 13900K and the 7950X3D are perfect suited to high-end motherboards, however (*7*)AMD’s X670/E motherboards lately get started at kind of $80 greater than (*9*)Intel’s Z790. The Core i9-13900K may be appropriate with previous-gen motherboards if they have got the suitable BIOS, and function would be the similar between 600- and 700-series if the ability supply is similar. That implies it’s worthwhile to make a selection a (*8*)DDR5 Z690 motherboard that provides just about all of the similar facilities because the Z790 and feature a lot of lower-cost choices that prevent much more money.
Pricing for an appropriate reminiscence package may be a sticking level. To avoid wasting money, you’ll pass with DDR4 with the 13900K and sacrifice a couple of proportion issues of gaming efficiency whilst holding the whole efficiency in productiveness packages. The financial savings are steep: You’ll be able to pay round $60 dollars to begin with (*5*)32GB of DDR4, however pricing begins at $105 for (*6*)32GB of DDR5. That DDR5 tax is unavoidable for Ryzen 9 7950X3D customers. Moreover, most likely the most productive reminiscence package is the one you don’t have to shop for — many upgraders most probably have already got a DDR4 package, which is a plus.
Winner: Intel Core i9-13900K
The $589 Core i9-13900K has a decrease price ticket than the $699 Ryzen 9 7950X3D, however the fps-per-dollar contest is a wash if we handiest consider chip pricing.
Alternatively, the excessive charge of AMD’s X-series motherboards provides additional charge in your construct in comparison to Intel’s Z790 platform. Moreover, you’ll go for a previous-gen Z690 to avoid wasting much more money on a 13900K construct (remember to guarantee BIOS compatibility).
The excessive value top rate for DDR5 additionally is still a sticking level even for a higher-tier Ryzen 9 construct. You’ll be able to pay just about two times as a lot for DDR5 reminiscence than DDR4 reminiscence, and DDR5 is a strict requirement for AMD’s 7950X3D. Total, those elements mix to make the Ryzen 9 7950X3D a miles pricier construct, giving the Core i9-13900K the lead within the pricing class.
Backside Line: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K
Swipe to scroll horizontally
(*20*)
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K
Row 0 – Mobile 0
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Intel Core i9-13900K
Options and Specs
X
X
Gaming
X
Row 2 – Mobile 2
Productiveness Programs
Row 3 – Mobile 1
X
Overclocking
X
X
Energy Intake, Potency, and Cooling
X
Row 5 – Mobile 2
Pricing
Row 6 – Mobile 1
X
Overall
4
4
The Core i9-13900K vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D struggle results in a four-to-four tie, however the contest is not as shut because the ranking implies. In spite of everything, every of those processors has its personal distinct benefits and downsides relying to your goal use case.
If you are development a no-holds-barred gaming rig and pricing is not a priority, the $699 Ryzen 9 7950X3D is your chip. The 7950X3D is 12% quicker than the Core i9-13900K in our collection of gaming benchmarks. In fact, that incorporates the caveat that its Three-D V-Cache tech does not boost up all video games calmly, so the lead may range relying to your gaming variety. In both case, this chip is the present gaming champ, and it regularly is not a detailed contest, particularly in sure recreation titles, as we see with Microsoft Flight Simulator 2021 and F1 2021.
The $589 Core i9-13900K is not as horny for a gaming-focused construct in case you are going with DDR5 reminiscence, nevertheless it turns into a lot more compelling with DDR4 in case you are taking a look to get right of entry to flagship-class efficiency at a lower cost level. You are going to sacrifice a couple of proportion issues of gaming efficiency with DDR4, however it’s worthwhile to save relatively slightly of cash for different machine components. Alternatively, in case you are strictly all for flagship-level gaming at a extra inexpensive value, the less-expensive $409 Core i7-13700K provides just about the similar gaming efficiency because the 13900K.
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is aggressive in maximum forms of apps, however its decrease efficiency in lightly-threaded duties generally is a sticking level in case you are all for productiveness paintings with advanced workflows. For productivity-focused techniques, or in case you are usually on the lookout for a cast all-rounder, the Core i9-13900K is the simpler selection.
The 7950X3D holds the benefit in all energy intake metrics, together with height energy and potency, that ranks among the finest we’ve ever examined. That ends up in extra forgiving cooling necessities and a cooler and quieter machine. At the different finish of the spectrum, overclocking is turning into an increasing number of much less attention-grabbing at the excessive finish for many fanatics — you’ll be able to get a greater payoff within the mid-range and low-end of the marketplace. The Intel and AMD processors each supply a minimum of some uplift after overclocking, making that contest a wash.
At the pricing entrance, the $699 Ryzen 9 7950X3D carries a hefty top rate that, blended with the excessive motherboard and reminiscence pricing, limits it to the highest-end gaming machines. However there’ll at all times be efficiency addicts prepared to pay best greenback for the very best; for the ones, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D provides the quickest gaming efficiency cash should purchase. We additionally be expecting that the 7950X3D will see steep reductions over the years. In the meantime, the Core i9-13900K slots in as a extra inexpensive choice and a greater all-rounder in productiveness packages.
We usually do not counsel spending this a lot on a chip if gaming is your number one function — you’ll to find higher lower-cost choices from each camps. As an alternative, players must wait to look how the eight-core $449 Ryzen 7 7800X3D pans out when it arrives on April 6, 2023. AMD says it’s going to just about fit the 7950X3D whilst handing over Core i9-13900K-beating efficiency at a miles lower cost level.
Allow 48h for review and removal.